Эссе по английскому на тему деньги. Topic Money (Топик Деньги)

Money has been the most disputable matter throughout the human history. What is money for? And when did it appear?

Money is a universal means of payment and a means of exchange. It appeared thousands of years ago. First people used things like animal skin and precious metals as money. But it wasn’t easy to carry and store them. The money we use nowadays is made of paper and cheap metals. They are banknotes and coins of different value.

Everybody uses money in our modern world. We all need money, we think about it and work for it. It is difficult to imagine today’s life without banknotes and coins, credit cards and cash. Modern technologies have influenced the way of payment: and plastic cards are becoming more and more popular today and they can be accepted even abroad. It’s really convenient and safe for travelers because you don’t have to carry the money in your wallet or exchange the currency in order to make purchases in foreign countries.

We need money to live and buy desired things and services. We can’t travel around the world, buy a car, rent an office, use the Internet or just buy food and clothes without money. People who earn much money can afford luxury goods: expensive cars and fantastic mansions, precious stones and unique works of art. The more money you earn, the more products you can buy. We must admit that being a millionaire is always dangerous. Rich people spend a lot on security because they are often robbed, kidnapped and even killed.

To my mind, money and happiness are not synonyms. Money doesn’t always mean well-being and prosperity. Sometimes money ruins people’s lives and destroys families. People who value material things only, who care too much about money cannot be happy. Happiness depends both on material and spiritual things. And you can’t buy health, love or true friends with money.

Перевод

На протяжении всей человеческой истории деньги являются наиболее спорным вопросом. Для чего существуют деньги? И когда они появились?

Деньги являются универсальным средством оплаты и средством обмена. Они появились тысячи лет назад. Первые люди использовали шкуру животных и драгоценные металлы в качестве денег. Но было нелегко их носить и хранить. Деньги, которыми мы пользуемся сегодня, изготовлены из бумаги и дешевых металлов. Это банкноты и монеты различной ценности.

В нашем современном мире все пользуются деньгами. Нам всем нужны деньги, мы думаем о них и работаем ради них. Сложно представить нынешнюю жизнь без банкнот и монет, кредитных карточек и наличности. Современные технологии оказали влияние на способ оплаты: пластиковые карты становятся сегодня все более и более популярными, и они принимаются даже заграницей. Это очень удобно и безопасно для путешественников, поскольку нет необходимости носить деньги в бумажнике или совершать обмен валюты для совершения покупок в других странах.

Деньги нам нужны для жизни и покупки желаемых вещей и услуг. Мы не сможем путешествовать по миру, приобретать машину, арендовать офис, пользоваться интернетом или просто покупать продукты и одежду без денег. Люди, зарабатывающие много денег, могут позволить себе предметы роскоши: дорогие автомобили и фантастические особняки, драгоценные камни и уникальные произведения искусства. Чем больше денег вы зарабатываете, тем больше товаров вы можете приобрести. Следует признать тот факт, что быть миллионером - это всегда опасно. Богатые люди тратят много на свою безопасность, потому что их часто грабят, похищают и даже убивают.

По моему мнению, деньги и счастье не являются синонимами. Деньги не всегда означают благополучие и процветание. Иногда деньги разрушают человеческие жизни и разваливают семьи. Люди, которые ценят лишь все материальное, которые слишком беспокоятся о деньгах, не могут стать счастливыми. Счастье зависит как от материального, так и от духовного. И вы не сможете купить здоровье, любовь и истинных друзей за деньги.

Если Вам понравилось — поделитесь с друзьями :

Присоединяйтесь к нам в Facebook !

Смотрите также:

Самое необходимое из теории языка:

Предлагаем пройти тесты онлайн:

Киндиева Елена

РЕЦЕНЗИЯ

на реферат по теме «История денег от древних времен до наших дней» ученицы 8 «Б» класса МБОУ СОШ № 43 Кировского района г. Екатеринбурга КИНДИЕВОЙ ЕЛЕНЫ

История денег не менее увлекательна, нежели история человечества и даже отдельно взятого героя или путешественника. Деньги являются важнейшим атрибутом экономики. От того, как функционирует денежная система, во многом зависит стабильность экономического развития страны. Изучение природы происхождения и видов денег, их основных функций, роли денег в экономике необходимо для понимания особенностей функционирования всей финансовой системы. Тема выбрана Еленой, исключительно исходя из ее интереса к истории происхождения денег от этапа возникновения товарно-денежных отношений между людьми и до настоящего времени. В данной работе автором предпринята попытка по возможности детально рассмотреть основные вопросы, касающиеся истории возникновения денег, их влияния на социальную, финансовую и этическую сторону жизни людей.

Работа, выполненая ученицей восьмого класса, имеет четкую логическую структуру – состоит из введения, шести глав, заключения и списка использованной литературы. Во вступлении автором работы четко определен объект, предмет, цель и задачи исследования, а также обоснована актуальность выбранной темы. В основном содержании работы автором рассматриваются вопросы возникновения денег на самом раннем этапе товарно-денежных отношений, предпосылки зарождения системы налоговых вычетов, появление первых бумажных денежных знаков и первых банков, торгов на бирже, влияния денег на социальную, финансовую, религиозную и этическую сторону жизни. В заключении представлен вывод по проведенному ученицей исследованию.

Работа интересна по содержанию, следует отметить стилистическое единство работы, качество её оформления.

Скачать:

Предварительный просмотр:

Министерство общего и профессионального образования

Свердловской области

Управление образования Администрации Кировского района

Реферат

по английскому языку

THE HISTORY OF MONEY

FROM ITS ORIGINS TO OUR TIME

Киндиева Елена Рамильевна,

ученица 8 «Б» класса

МБОУ СОШ № 43

с углубленным изучением

отдельных предметов

Руководитель:

Сгонникова Евгения Михайловна,

к.п.н., учитель английского языка МБОУ СОШ № 43

с углубленным изучением

отдельных предметов

г. Екатеринбург, 2013

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1. The History Of Money

CHAPTER 2. Kings And Rulers

2.1. Providing Society With Money.

2.2. People Don"t Like Taxes.

CHAPTER 3. Trade, Banking And Paper Money

3.1. Trade

3.2. Paper Money

CHAPTER 4. Towards Modern Money

4.1. The First Central Bank

4.2. Bursting Bubbles

4.3. Speculating And Gambling

CHAPTER 5. Numbers And Ethics - Is There A Conflict?

5.1. Money Is Numbers

5.2. Ethics And Money

CHAPTER 6. The Industrial Revolution And Britain"s Financial Supremacy

6.1. International Traders And Bankers

6.2. Taxes And Trade In The Industrial Age

6.3. Opposition To Capitalism

CHAPTER 7. The Rise Of America And The One-World Economy

7.1. Between The Wars

7.2. Since Bretton Woods

CHAPTER 8. History In The Making

8.1. Small Is Beautiful

8.2. Money Values In Conflict With Ethical Values

8.3. Understanding How The Money System Works.

CONCLUSION

ABBREVIATIONS USED IN WORK

SOURCES

INTRODUCTION

The topic of my research is “The History of Money from Its Origins to Our Time”. It touches different aspects connected with the history of money, how it all began and what it makes valuable.

I started researching this topic because I"m really interested in it and it will expand my horizons.

So, the object of my research is money at different stages of its development.

The subject of my research is to find out the impact of money on various spheres of people’ lives.

The purpose of my research is to understand how the money affected the lives of people.

In my research I turn close attention to the history of money and the aim of my investigation is to answer the following questions:

1. how did it begin?
2. how has it evolved to the present day?
3. what has it enabled humans to achieve?
4. why do so many people in the world today have problems with it and suffer from the way it works?

Humans are the only creatures that use money. Animals and birds and insects and fishes and plants exist together in the world without it. But in human societies the earning and spending of money has become one of the most important ways we connect with one another.

Over the centuries, money has reflected changes in politics and government, in economic life and power, in science and technology, in religious and other cultural beliefs, in family and neighbourhood life, and in other aspects of how we live. And it has not just reflected those changes; it has also helped to bring them about.

Knowing something about how that has happened can help us to see how the role of money in people"s lives may continue to change. For young people growing up in the early 21st century this could be more important than ever before.

HAPTER 1. THE HISTORY OF MONEY.

The use of money is as old as the human civilization. Money is basically a method of exchange, and coins and notes are just items of exchange. But money was not always the same form as the money today, and is still developing.

The basis of all early commerce was barter, in other words the direct exchange of one product for another, with the relative values a matter for negotiation. Subsequently both livestock, particularly cattle, and plant products such as grain, come to be used as money in many different societies at different periods. The earliest evidence of banking is found in Mesopotamia between 3000 and 2000 B.C. when temples were used to store grain and other valuables used in trade.

Various items have been used by different societies at different times. Aztecs used cacao beans. Norwegians once used butter. The early U.S. colonists used tobacco leaves and animal hides. The people of Paraguay used snails. Roman soldiers were paid a "salarium" of salt. On the island of Nauru, the islanders used rats. Human slaves have also been used as currency around the world. In the 16th century, the average exchange value of a slave was 8000 pounds of sugar.

Gradually, however, people began exchanging items that had no intrinsic value, but which had only agreed-upon or symbolic value. An example is the cowrie shell. Metal tool money, such as knife and spade monies, was also first used in China. These early metal monies developed into primitive versions of round coins at the end of the Stone Age. Chinese coins were made out of copper, often containing holes so they could be put together like a chain. The Chinese invented also paper money during the T"ang Dynasty.

Outside of China, the first coins developed out of lumps of silver. They soon took the familiar round form of today, and were stamped with various gods and emperors to mark their authenticity. These early coins first appeared in the Kingdom of Lydia (now in Turkey) in the 7th century B.C. Paper money was adopted in Europe much later than in Asia and the Arab world - primarily because Europe didn"t have paper.

The Bank of Sweden issued the first paper money in Europe in 1661, though this was also a temporary measure. In 1694 the Bank of England was founded and began to issue promissory notes, originally handwritten but later printed. To make travelling with gold less dangerous, goldsmiths, or people who made jewelry and other items out of gold, came up with an idea. The goldsmiths started writing out notes on pieces of paper that said the person who had the note could trade the note in for gold. These promissory notes were the beginning of paper money in Europe. If you look at a British bank note today, you"ll see it still says: I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of twenty pounds.

CHAPTER 2. KINGS AND RULERS.

The Emperor Charlemagne (742-814) minted coins of silver dug from mines in Germany by slaves who were worked to death. These coins were modeled on the old Roman "denarius". In France "denier" coins were used until the French Revolution. In Britain pounds, shillings and pence were used until the 1970s; the shorthand for them was £sd; and the "d" still stood for denarius.

In spite of this link with the Roman past, the feudal societies that emerged from the Dark Ages were organised around land, rather than money. Dukes and barons and other nobles owed services to their king in exchange for their lands. Lower landowners owed services to those above them. At the bottom of the ladder, farmers and villagers and serfs owed services to their local landlords. An important service to the king was to provide men for his armies. Apart from military service, farmers and villagers and serfs had to give their landlords a share of the produce from their land - meat, cloth, wheat, fruit, and so on - and also do certain kinds of work on their estates, like building roads, cutting trees, and harvesting and transporting crops.

Over the centuries the obligation to provide goods and services was gradually replaced by money. Subjects should pay taxes to kings and rulers, people should pay rents to their landlords, and people should get wages for working. In general, the importance of money in almost all aspects of life has continued to grow right up to the present time. It has brought freedom and wellbeing for many people, but it has damaged and destroyed the lives of many. Some people think we have now become too dependent on employers to organise our work and provide our incomes. They suggest we should all receive a "citizen"s income", as our share in the value of common resources like land.

As countries like France, England and Spain developed into nations, their rulers strengthened their control over money. Some of the most important activities of democratic governments today have grown out of that. They are:

1) supplying money for everyone to use ;

2) collecting money as public revenue by taxing us and charging us in various ways, so that they can spend it on our behalf;

All these activities have grown up higgledy piggledy over time. Some people think they should now be reshaped as a system better designed to meet people"s needs in today"s more democratic world.

PROVIDING SOCIETY WITH MONEY.

Money can be created in various ways. Rulers have minted it as coins for themselves to spend. Bankers have created it to lend to their customers, either as banknotes or simply by writing it into their customers" accounts as "credit"; and members of local groups can themselves create money in "alternative" currencies in exchange for goods and services provided by other members of their group. In every case, whoever creates new money benefits from doing so. One question people are asking today is: who should profit from creating money in official currencies like the euro and the dollar and the pound?

In medieval times providing the money supply meant minting coins and putting them into circulation by spending them. The power and wealth of a ruler depended partly on whether his money was widely used by people in his own and other countries. In the 13th century King Louis IX of France (St. Louis) issued an edict that his coins should be used for making payments throughout the kingdom - much as the Athenian government had ordered in the 5th century BC. Rulers profited from producing coins of greater value than the cost of producing them. The profit was called seigniorage. It still applies today to part of the money supply. For example, the European Central Bank spends much less on manufacturing euro coins and banknotes than their value as money. That creates a profit which the ECB distributes to Eurozone member governments. But today coins and banknotes make up only a small part of the money supply.

Rulers were able to increase their profits by reducing the value of the gold or silver contained in the coins. This was known as "debasing the coinage". Henry VIII of England (1509-1547) did it. What most of us remember about him is that he had six wives, replaced the Pope as head of the Church of England, and "dissolved" the monasteries and took possession of them himself. But he also got the nickname "Old Copper-nose". He made everyone exchange their silver coins for new copper coins, covered with a thin surface of silver to make them look genuine. But the silver wore off the King"s nose on the coins and people saw he had cheated them. Debasing the currency has been one way of deceiving people about money. Other tricks became more important as paper money and electronic money became more important than coins.

PEOPLE DON"T LIKE TAXES.

Taxes originated as tribute to rulers and priests in prehistoric societies. They are as old as money itself. After the Dark Ages, rulers revived taxes to provide them with money to spend on wars, building roads and other purposes - including spending on their palaces, servants, entertainments, and all their personal expenses. Only later when democracies emerged did people begin to think that public spending on the needs of society should be distinct from private spending on the personal needs of rulers.

Taxes have always been unpopular, which is why rulers have looked for other ways of raising money, like debasing the coinage, seizing the wealth of monasteries, and borrowing money. As early as the 14th century a businessman in Florence told his sons, "Avoid falsehoods like the plague - except to escape taxes, because then you are not lying to take someone else"s goods but to prevent your own from being unjustly seized".

In the Middle Ages harsh taxes caused many revolts of the people, like the Jacquerie in the Isle-de-France in 1358, the peasants" revolt led by Wat Tyler against a poll-tax in England in 1381, and the communes" revolt against a salt-tax in Guyenne in 1548.

Those revolts were pitilessly put down and their leaders were executed. More successful tax revolts later by wealthier people helped to change the course of history.

In England, property owners protesting against King Charles I"s ship-tax - to get money for his navy - started the Civil War which led to his execution in 1649. In America in the 1770s, resistance to unfair taxation helped to cause the War of Independence. A tax on American importers of tea but not British ones, had given British importers an unfair advantage. In Boston on the evening of 16 December 1773 a hundred and fifty men, pretending to be Mohawk Indians, boarded three British ships, broke open the tea chests, and threw them into the harbour. As news of the "Boston Tea Party" spread, similar acts of resistance elsewhere led to war, which the Americans won.

Since then "No taxation without representation" has been an important principle of democracy: people should only have to pay taxes which have been agreed by their elected representatives.

CHAPTER 3. TRADE, BANKING AND PAPER MONEY.

TRADE.

In the 12th and 13th centuries Christian armies from all over Europe joined one another in Crusades to capture Jerusalem from the Muslims. One of the results was increasing trade between their countries and between Europe and other parts of the world.

So banking and money-changing became more important and profitable. The most famous bankers were from Florence. By the 15th century Cosimo de Medici had built up a multinational bank with branches in Avignon, Bruges and London and various Italian cities. He became ruler of Florence. He and his grandson Lorenzo the Magnificent commissioned numerous buildings and works of art by Renaissance masters like Brunelleschi, Botticelli and Michelangelo, and turned Florence into the beautiful city which it still is today.

PAPER MONEY.

Paper money had been used in China for many years. When Marco Polo returned to Venice from China in 1295, he described in his book The Travels of Marco Polo how Kublai Khan"s government issued paper notes authenticated by his officials. Everyone throughout China was compelled to accept them as money, and anyone who counterfeited them was sentenced to death. Being able to create unlimited amounts of paper money gave the Great Khan more power to control economic life in his country than rulers in Europe had. They depended on having enough gold and silver to mint coins. Economic life flourished in China at that time.

Marco Polo"s book encouraged bankers in Europe to use paper for money. From the 13th century paper "bills of exchange" helped merchants and bankers to do business in different places. Instead of carrying heavy loads of various kinds of coins with him, a merchant could buy a paper bill of exchange from his banker before he set out. It would instruct the banker"s agent in another city to pay the merchant a certain sum of money in that city"s currency on a certain day in the future, so that he would have the right money to spend when he got there.

Bankers and goldsmiths also gave paper notes as receipts and "promises to pay" to customers who had deposited coins and gold and silver with them for safekeeping. In the course of time, people began to pass on these bankers" notes to one another as a convenient means of payment. Over the following centuries the notes became a widely accepted substitute for money, and eventually they were recognised as actual money.

That is how banknotes came into existence.

For several centuries banknotes continued to be linked to the value of gold and silver, and gold and silver coins. In France, for example a ten franc banknote represented a weight of gold worth ten francs. Because the link with gold no longer now exists, a Euro note today simply says "10 EURO".

The top Jesuit priest in the 16th century said the merchants and bankers "have so many tricks for inventing ingenious practices that we can hardly see what is going on at the bottom of it all". Until then the tricks were mostly designed to conceal that the bankers were lending money for interest, which was a sin according to Christian teaching. But as that teaching changed and bankers were able to profit openly from lending money for interest, they learned a new trick - how to create money out of nothing in order to lend it.

This is how they did it. Their experience as bankers showed them that, with their paper banknotes circulating as means of payment, they were seldom asked to pay out more than a fraction of the gold which their customers had deposited with them. So they realised they could lend more money in the form of paper banknotes than the value of the gold they held. The interest the banks got from lending paper banknotes was much greater than the cost of printing them, so lending them was very profitable. However, if bank customers rightly suspected that a bank had lent too much paper money, they all rushed to the bank to get back their gold money, it wasn"t there, the bank collapsed and many customers lost their money altogether.

For many years people argued that banks should not be allowed to create new money as banknotes. The second US president, John Adams (1797-1801), said that every dollar issued as bank notes beyond the quantity of gold and silver held by a bank "represents nothing, and is therefore a cheat upon somebody". The more famous president, Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865), agreed; some people say it was why he was assassinated. Today central banks like the European Central Bank have taken over the printing of banknotes on behalf of governments. But the commercial banks have learned a new trick. Electronic money in people"s computerised bank accounts has now replaced banknotes as the largest part of the money supply. The commercial banks now create it simply by writing profit-making loans into their customers" accounts. Today"s reformers say electronic money should now be issued on behalf of governments, as coins and banknotes are.

CHAPTER 4. TOWARDS MODERN MONEY.

THE FIRST CENTRAL BANK.

In 1694 a war being fought by King Louis XIV of France against England triggered an event that became a milestone in the history of money. King William III of England needed huge sums to fight the war and the English Parliament was unwilling to increase taxes. So, with the help of a Scotsman called William Paterson, some City of London businessmen persuaded King William to let them set up a bank to lend him money. As banker to the government it was called the Bank of England, although it was a privately owned commercial bank.

The Bank felt sure of receiving the interest on the loans, because the government would use taxes of future years to pay it. So it lent the money without insisting that the government should pay it back, so long as it continued to pay interest on it. That encouraged the government to borrow more and more. Governments elsewhere in the world have followed suit, and all their countries have steadily built up growing national debts. Taxpayers now have to pay so much interest on what their governments have borrowed, that they pay higher taxes than would otherwise be needed.

Over the next two and a half centuries the Bank of England developed bit by bit from a commercial bank into an agency of the state, and in 1946 it was nationalised. Today, most central banks around the world, including the European Central Bank, are not commercial banks but state agencies.

BURSTING BUBBLES

Paterson"s compatriot, John Law, became a great celebrity. Law had killed a man in London in 1694 in a dispute about a woman and money, and was sentenced to death for murder. He escaped and spent the following years in Scotland, Italy, Holland, Germany, Italy and France - gambling, studying banking schemes, and making money.

His big opportunity came in Paris in 1715.

Louis XIV had died leaving the Duc d"Orléans to deal with huge debts and a chaotic financial situation as Regent for Louis" five-year-old great-grandson Louis XV. With the Duke"s agreement Law set up a bank which issued its own banknotes. It was so successful that by 1719 he had become Minister of Finance and his bank, now called "Banque Générale", had taken over the Mississippi settlement of Louisiana in North America and other French overseas trading companies. Law"s "System" thus combined issuing money with banking and lending money, managing the national debt, and controlling much of France"s overseas trade. It seemed like a sure winner, and in a frenzy to buy its shares Parisians drove their price sky-high. But it had issued so many banknotes and shares that they lost their value and, as people panicked to sell them, the "Mississippi Bubble" burst. In 1720 the System collapsed, many people lost their money, and Law was dismissed and died in Venice nine years later.

In London the Bank of England was lucky to survive its first few years, having also issued too many banknotes. Then in 1719-20 London experienced the South Sea Bubble. So many people swarmed to buy shares in the fraudulent South Sea Company that they drove up the price a hundred times in a few months. They then panicked and all rushed to sell the shares. So the South Sea Bubble burst in London like the Mississippi Bubble burst in Paris. Many people lost all their money, and the government had to resign.

In later years the 18th century philosopher/economist Adam Smith described John Law"s French venture as "the most extravagant project both of banking and stockjobbing that, perhaps, the world ever saw"; Voltaire described it as "a stupendous game of chance, played by an unknown man, and a foreigner at that, against a whole nation"; and Karl Marx, the famous socialist economist who wrote "das Kapital” and was the founder of Communism, described Law as having "the pleasant mixed character of swindler and prophet". John Law was remembered in France seventy years afterwards when so many paper money assignats were issued by the revolutionary government in 1789 that by 1796 they were worth less than the cost of printing them.

Later, those two unhappy experiences were so vividly remembered in France that financiers and capitalists resisted the adoption of paper money, which retarded the development of a modern French economy.

SPECULATING AND GAMBLING

The Mississippi and South Sea Bubbles are examples of the frequent "booms and busts" in the history of money. A rapid rise takes place in the price of something - shares or houses, for example - as people compete to buy them, hoping that their prices will continue to rise and they will become worth more and more. But then, once people realise that the rise can"t continue and hurry to sell, the price collapses leaving many people losing their money. These booms and busts often affect things that can provide stores for people"s wealth - "assets" like land, gold, silver, jewellery, works of art and other objects of high-value, as well as shares and houses.

The most famous of all booms and busts was the great Wall Street crash of stocks and shares in 1929, followed by the worldwide economic depression of the 1930s that led to the Second World War. Investors had been frantically buying shares with borrowed money, share values had risen spectacularly, many investors had become millionaires (on paper), and had continued to buy, assuming that the "bull market" would continue and that when they sold their shares they would be left with high profits even after paying back their loans. A well known economist of that time stated confidently: "The nation is marching along a permanently high plateau of prosperity." But five days later, people began to doubt whether share prices would stay that high; a self-reinforcing "bear market" set in and prices collapsed, losing $16 billion in value. Bankrupt speculators jumped to their death out of skyscraper windows, hundreds of American banks went bust, and thousands of bank customers lost all their money.

More recently, in the dot.com boom of the 1990s, the shares of computing and internet companies rose to prices far beyond what they could be expected to justify by their profits, and then collapsed. Almost anything can be the subject of boom and bust – like the tulipmania which gripped the citizens of Amsterdam in 1633, when they drove up the price of tulip bulbs beyond all reason before it suddenly collapsed leaving many of them penniless.

As the money system has developed further it has thrown up many new opportunities to make money out of money by complicated forms of betting - on changes in the values of different currencies, for example, and many other forms what are called "derivatives". These enable individuals and companies to gamble with large sums of money which they don"t possess, so if the gamble goes wrong they suffer financial disaster. But, although the experts can make money out of these schemes themselves, and claim that by doing so they help to make the money system work more efficiently, other people can lose a lot of money when a gamble goes badly wrong - as when Barings Bank was brought to an untimely end .

King William of England and the two Scotsmen who explored new ways of dealing with money around 1700 were doing so to serve their own interests, not to provide an efficient system of money for everyone. That has remained true of almost all their successors. Will it continue to be true of those who explore new ways of dealing with money in the more democratic world of the 21st century?

CHAPTER 5. NUMBERS AND ETHICS - IS THERE A CONFLICT?

MONEY IS NUMBERS.

How much are different things worth? Money gives an answer. It puts numbers on value. That has been true of coins and banknotes. But we can see it more clearly now, when most money is disembodied numbers in computerised bank accounts, and most payments are made by transferring numbers electronically from one bank account to another. We can think of the system of money as a network of changing numbers.

Some of the numbers are about flows of money - the payments we make by handing over banknotes and coins to someone else or by transferring money from our bank account to theirs. Others are about stocks of money - how much there is in everyone"s bank accounts and wallets and purses, resulting from the payments that have flowed to them and from them.

Numbers of all kinds played a much smaller part in medieval people"s lives than in ours.

Although the regular chiming of monastery bells told the monks when to get up, pray, eat, work and go to bed, most people experienced time directly from the rhythms of the natural world - daylight and darkness, sun and moon, the movements of stars, and the changing seasons - and not from the number of days and hours and minutes on a calendar or clock. Although the builders of medieval cathedrals and other skilled workers measured lengths and heights and weights in numbers, most people"s knowledge depended directly on their senses - what they saw and felt and heard and smelled and tasted. Money did exist, but it played a small part in most people"s lives and work and dealings with one another.

The scientific revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries greatly increased human understanding of how the natural world works, including the planets and stars. The mathematician Galileo played a big part in it. From then on, knowledge relied more and more on numbers. By the 19th century the scientist Lord Kelvin could say, "When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know what you mean; but when you cannot measure and express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind".

At the same time as numbers became more important in knowledge, money became more important in practical life. People came to use money to measure the value of their work and wealth and time. In "Advice to a Young Tradesman" (1748) Benjamin Franklin, the American printer and statesman, said "Remember that time is money. He that idly loses five shillings" worth of time loses five shillings, and might as prudently throw five shillings into the sea". The difference between the money people earned and the money they spent (their profit or loss) became crucial. As Mr Micawber said in Charles Dickens" novel "David Copperfield" (1849), "Annual income £20, annual expenditure £19.19.6, result happiness. Annual income £20, annual expenditure £20.0.6, result misery".

Economists now use money numbers to measure the value of many things, and to advise people and companies and governments what to do. Some even think of economics as an objective science like other sciences. But money numbers do not measure objective aspects of nature - like length, height, weight, or the data of physics and chemistry. Money numbers provide us with a scoring system for the game of life.

Like any scoring system, the money system heavily influences how the game is played - and money numbers influence us particularly because we can use them to buy things.

The fact is that the money system has been shaped by human decisions designed to serve particular human purposes. Understanding why it now works as it does and how it might be improved, does not depend on objective measurement. It depends on deciding what purposes money should serve. That is an ethical decision.

ETHICS AND MONEY.

Aristotle, one of the great philosophers of ancient Athens (384-322 BC), believed that the natural and proper purpose of money is to enable us to exchange necessities of life - like clothes and food. Our need for most things is limited; we can"t wear unlimited clothes or eat unlimited food. But, because money can buy all sorts of different things, some people want unlimited amounts of money, as Midas wanted to turn everything into gold. So they may be tempted to practise usury - to make money out of money by lending it at interest. Aristotle condemned that.

Jesus was furious with the money-changers for polluting the temple in Jerusalem with their haggling, and drove them out of that sacred place. St Aquinas (1225-1274) and other medieval Christian schoolmen and church leaders taught that money must be controlled by the ethics of right and wrong, by what was a just wage for a particular worker or trader and what was a just price for a particular thing. That teaching meant that lending money at interest was a sin. In his epic poem L"Inferno the Italian poet Dante (1265-1321) describes money-lenders wailing in the lowest parts of Hell in their after-life; God had created nature"s resources and human work as the two true sources of wealth, so the money-lenders" way of making money - by buying and selling it – was a sin against God. Islamic teaching today still forbids lending money for interest, seeing it as unjust that a lender of money for a project - say, a new shop - doesn"t have to do any work to make the shop a success, while the borrower has to bear all the costs if it should fail.

Christian teaching about money changed after the Middle Ages. This followed the growth of commerce and trade, particularly in Northern Europe where the Protestant Reformation against the Catholic Church was strongest. In Germany Martin Luther (1483-1546) preached that useful work in the business of the world was more acceptable to God than the quiet, escapist life of monks in monasteries. John Calvin (1509-1564), who lived among the merchants and townspeople of Geneva, taught that the medieval scholastics were wrong, that condemning usury was out of date, that lending money to support business and trade was fulfilling a productive purpose, and that charging someone for borrowing your money was no worse than charging them for renting your house.

Later Protestants taught that making money was actually a service to God. If you didn"t make money when you could, you would be rejecting God"s gifts and failing to use them as His steward. This Protestant ethic gave birth to the message of capitalism, that making money is a central purpose of human life. This became particularly influential in Britain and America.

Adam Smith"s saying that "it is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest" has been used to support that message. So has the idea that the "invisible hand" of the market will "match supply with demand" - meaning that, in order to make money, producers will produce for sale what consumers will pay for, and so everyone"s needs will be met. Recently this has misled some financial and business people to practice the unethical philosophy "Greed is good, Greed is right, and Greed works" (American financier Gordon Gekko, 1987).

CHAPTER 6. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND BRITAIN"S FINANCIAL SUPREMACY.

The first iron bridge in the world spans the River Severn in Shropshire in England. It was built by Abraham Darby III in 1779. His grandfather, Abraham Darby I (1678-1717), had discovered how to use coal instead of charcoal to make iron. This led to the use of iron to make engines and machines of every kind, and to build railways and ships and factories. It made the Industrial Revolution possible, and that led to Britain becoming the most powerful 19th-century nation, dominating the world"s manufacturing, trading and shipping. The pound sterling became the main international currency, with London as the world"s financial centre - channelling huge sums of money to governments and companies to invest in projects all over the world.

The Darbys were Quakers, a sect of non-conformist protestants, kept out of university and professional and military jobs because of their religion. The enterprising pioneers of the Industrial Age included many other non-conformist outsiders too, like the families of Barclays and Lloyds. They expanded from brewing and ironmongery into providing banking services for other growing businesses. Two hundred and fifty years later Barclays and Lloyds have become big multinational banks, important players in the global money game.

INTERNATIONAL TRADERS AND BANKERS.

Britain"s industrial progress benefited from its international trade in two ways. First, trade provided export opportunities, as in the "trading triangle" between Europe, Africa, and America. Ships took textiles, iron, and guns from Britain to Africa and exchanged them for African slaves; they took the slaves to North or South America, and sold them to owners of plantations and mines in exchange for sugar, tobacco, gold and silver; and they brought those back to Europe. This profitable three-way trade peaked between 1740 and 1810. It greatly increased the population and prosperity of the port cities of Liverpool and Bristol, and quickened London"s development as the world"s financial centre. The second way trade helped industrial progress was that it provided investment money. For example, Quaker friends invested profits from the Bristol trade in the Darbys" ironworks.

The Barings and Rothschilds were also outsiders. They were two families from Germany who came to England, set up banks in the City of London, and eventually became very wealthy and powerful members of the British aristocracy. In 1803, when Napoleon needed money for his wars and offered to sell Louisiana to the USA for $15 million, Barings lent the USA the money to pay him; so Louisiana became part of the USA instead of belonging to France. After Napoleon"s defeat in 1815, when Barings raised a loan of 315 million francs for the new French government, the Duc de Richelieu said "There are six Great Powers in Europe: England, France, Prussia, Austria, Russia and Baring Brothers". Barings Bank continued to trade until 1995, when the loss of £860 million by one of its traders betting on "derivatives" in Singapore brought the famous 200-year-old bank to an inglorious end (Chapter 5).

Nathan Rothschild set up a bank in London in 1809. His four brothers also had banks-in Frankfurt, Paris, Vienna and Naples. He used the family"s network of couriers to supply Wellington"s armies with money in the war against Napoleon. They also brought him very useful news. When Napoleon lost the battle of Waterloo, Nathan heard about it before anyone else at the London stock exchange. He immediately sold all his British government stocks, so that everyone else would think Napoleon must have won and sell their shares too. They did, the price of the shares fell, Nathan bought them up cheap, and made a fortune. He then became a very successful international banker. By 1832 he was speaking for the City of London: "This country is the Bank for the world...

All transactions in India, in China, in Germany, in the whole world are guided here and settled through this country". Rothschilds played a big part in the California Gold Rush (1849), in the British Government gaining control of the Suez Canal (1879), and in financing railways around the world. The Rothschild Bank still exists today.

TAXES AND TRADE IN THE INDUSTRIAL AGE.

The effect of taxes on trade often creates dispute. Today there is a dispute about European taxes on food from developing countries. This restricts their exports to us, while we press them to accept exports from us. In the 19 th century there was a similar dispute in Britain. The tax on wheat imported from other countries had made it expensive and restricted the amount imported. This protection against foreign competition kept prices and profits high for British landowners and farmers. But the new industrialists in the cities wanted food to cost less, so that they could pay their workers lower wages, reduce business costs, and sell more machines and other industrial goods at home and abroad.

They won the argument and got the tax abolished in 1846. This "repeal of the Corn Laws" was seen as a historic event: Britain had left the agricultural age and entered the industrial age. It was a victory for "free trade" over "protectionism", letting the nation"s consumers buy things more cheaply instead benefiting home producers by keeping prices up. But it also showed that, while free trade is good for some people, it is bad for others. The antiglobalisation movement today argues that it unfairly benefits rich countries at the expense of poorer ones .

OPPOSITION TO CAPITALISM.

The poverty of working people in European cities in the 19th century was so bad that in 1848 the French political philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859) said, "We are sleeping on a volcano... A wind of revolution blows, the storm is on the horizon". In that same year Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Freidrich Engels (1820-1895) published the Communist Manifesto, and revolutions took place in France, Germany, Italy and Austria-Hungary. They were all stamped out. For Karl Marx, this confirmed the lesson of Britain"s parliamentary reform in 1832: when the middle-class owners of capital had achieved their political aims, they would no longer help working people to achieve theirs. His book Das Kapital convinced many people that, under capitalism, money was used to exploit workers in Europe and the subject peoples of European colonies. After that, trade unions grew up to campaign for better wages and conditions for workers; communists ruled Russia for seventy years after the 1917 revolution; and many socialist governments have been elected elsewhere since the end of the Second World War. But socialism has not reformed the money system; and how it works and could be improved is still a great mystery to most of the world"s people.

The alternative institutions of the 19th century like building societies, which grew up to enable working people to club together to borrow money to buy their houses, have mostly now become absorbed in today"s mainstream system of money and finance.

Today"s alternative financial initiatives are rather different .

CHAPTER 7. THE RISE OF AMERICA AND THE ONE-WORLD ECONOMY.

In the 18th century when Britain ruled an immense colonial empire, the British government refused to let its American colonists have a currency of their own.

Disputes with Britain about this, and about taxes, provoked the Americans to fight successfully for their independence in 1776. That link between money and freedom helped to shape their outlook on life.

After independence America grew and developed its resources with astonishing speed. For example, 100 squatters at Chicago in 1830 became "the first city of the prairies" with more than half a million people in 1880 and a million in 1890. By then, little more than a century after the Declaration of Independence had declared "all men are created equal", the "Robber Barons" were creating huge fortunes with ruthless enterprise, paying rock-bottom wages to thousands of immigrant workers from Europe.

One of these tycoons of the railway age was John D Rockefeller (1839-1937). He set up Standard Oil, became the USA"s first billionaire, and gave $500 million to medical research. Another was Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919). He came from Scotland as a boy in 1848 and built up a huge steel industry. Then, saying it was disgraceful if a man died rich, he gave away $400 million, including the cost of three thousand public libraries in America, Britain, Europe and Africa. A third was the banker John Pierpont Morgan (1837-1913). He bought up half the American railway system and raised $1.4 billion to buy out Carnegie"s steel business. A popular song called him "Morgan, Morgan, the great Financial Gorgon". He symbolised the power of American money.

BETWEEN THE WARS.

In the period between the beginning of the first World War (1914-18) and the end of the second (1939-1945) the USA replaced Britain as the world"s financial superpower.

It was also a period of unusually severe money disasters.

The Great Crash on the New York stock market in 1929 might seem the most dramatic. But in Germany in the early 1920s runaway inflation had meant that money lost its value and became almost worthless. The prices of everything went sky high. People rushed to the shops with wheelbarrows full of almost worthless banknotes to spend all their wages and savings as fast as they could, before their money lost every bit of its value.

This led to the problem of the Gold Standard. Within a country the Gold Standard had required banks to give gold in exchange for banknotes if their customers asked for it.

In trade between countries it had meant that a country receiving payments in the currency of another could require the paying country to give gold in exchange for its currency. When the Gold Standard was dropped in the 1914-18 war, money no longer had to be exchangeable for gold, and that allowed more paper money to be created and put into circulation.

In the 1920s various countries tried restore the Gold Standard, in order to keep up the value of money and avoid inflation. But that led to less money in circulation, and that damped down economic activity and employment. This caused problems no less than inflation had done. In Britain, for example, Winston Churchill"s decision as finance minister in 1925 to restore the Gold Standard caused nationwide pay cuts and a General Strike of all workers. The Gold Standard was suspended again in 1931.

All these problems contributed to worldwide economic crisis and very high unemployment in the 1930s. In America President Roosevelt brought in the "New Deal". It invested large sums of government money in projects to create jobs, including big dams, big power stations and many smaller community schemes. The celebrated economist John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) proposed this for Britain and other countries, and "Keynesian economics" strongly influenced government policies in many countries until the 1970s. But what actually ended the economic slow-down of the 1930s was massive government spending on armaments for the second World War.

SINCE BRETTON WOODS.

In July 1944, when the second World War was nearly over, an international conference met at Bretton Woods in the USA to decide how the post-war international money system could avoid repeating the disasters of the inter-war years. It resulted in setting up the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, and much later the World Trade Organisation (WTO). These bodies are controlled by the USA and other rich and powerful countries as separate organisations from the United Nations itself.

Keynes argued that a proper international currency was needed, which would not belong to any single nation. The Americans said No. They wanted to be top financial superpower, with the US dollar replacing Britain"s pound as the main international currency. The other countries, bankrupted by the costs of the war, had to agree.

A link was kept between the world"s money and gold until 1971. Exchange rates between other countries" currencies and the US dollar were fixed, and the USA was obliged to meet requests from other countries to give them gold at a price of $35 an ounce in exchange for US dollars which they had earned in international trade. Even today the bullion depository of the US Mint at Fort Knox holds 143.7 million ounces of gold valued at $42.22 per ounce - a total value equal to about 4.6 billion euros. In 1971, however, the USA under President Nixon found it could no longer repay other countries with gold for all the dollars they were now earning, and the remaining link between the world"s money and gold was scrapped. National currencies now "float" against one another in value; for example every day the euro goes up or down a certain amount compared with the dollar.

In today"s huge market for trading national currencies internationally, only a tiny proportion of the transactions are connected with real trade between countries in things like oil or coffee or machinery. The rest - over 2 $trillion worth a day - aim to make profit from buying and selling currencies in exchange for one another. When everyone decides to sell a particular currency its value can collapse, destroying businesses and jobs in the country to which it belongs.

Because the US dollar is no longer linked to gold there is no limit to how many dollars the USA can create for other countries to use for international trade and investment.

Creating money that other people have to use brings in a profit called "seigniorage", resulting in other countries now paying an estimated $400 billion a year to the USA. This is a feature of the world"s present money system which prevents poor countries paying off their debts and stifles their development. More generally, people in the growing worldwide "anti-globalisation movement" regard today"s international money system as a particular cause of injustice and poverty. They see the world economy as if it is a game, with rules (based on international treaties and regulations) and scoring system (based on the international money system) unfairly designed by the biggest players to enable them to win.

Since the euro came into existence in 2002 some people have suggested it should capture a good share of the profit now enjoyed by the US dollar for providing the world"s main international currency. But perhaps a genuinely international currency, belonging to all the world"s people would be a more efficient and fairer way to meet our international trading and investment needs, as was suggested but rejected at Bretton Woods over sixty years ago. That idea will probably grow stronger in the coming years.

CHAPTER 8. HISTORY IN THE MAKING.

SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL.

In the early 1930s, when economic activity was at its lowest and unemployment at its highest in many countries, a man called Michael Unterbuggenberger lived in the small town of Worgl, between Salzburg and Innsbruck in Austria. As burgomaster he persuaded the town to issue local money in the form of tickets ("scrip") corresponding to one, five and ten Austrian schillings. It put these new local banknotes into circulation by paying them to unemployed people for building and repairing local streets and drains and bridges; they spent the notes in the shops; and the shopkeepers paid their local taxes and their local suppliers with them.

This new currency led to a dramatic increase in economic activity, which was partly due to a special feature of the notes. They lost 1% of their value every month, unless their holders attached a stamp bought from the town council.

People were eager to spend them as soon as possible before they lost value - which increased what economists call the "velocity of money"; the sooner people spend it, the faster it circulates. But the scheme had a sad end. The Austrian National Bank suppressed it, fearing that successful local currencies would threaten its central control over the country"s money. Many US local currencies suffered a similar fate; the New York bankers persuaded President Roosevelt to outlaw them in 1933.

Recently there has been a revival of local currencies and local community banks in many countries, in reaction against excessive local dependence on remote government agencies to provide money for public services and on big businesses like supermarket chains to provide local people with food and other goods, and jobs that pay their wages. The new currencies, described as "regional", "alternative", "community", "complementary", "barter", and "scrip", include some called Systemes d"Echange Locaux (SEL) in France, Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS) in various English-speaking countries, and Time Dollars in the USA. In Eurozone countries interest in these currencies has grown since national currencies like the franc were replaced by the Euro and the European Central Bank. They could play a significant part in the later 21st-century world economy.

MONEY VALUES IN CONFLICT WITH ETHICAL VALUES.

Another feature of recent years is the growing number of people who want their money to support purposes which they approve. In spending their money, they are not just trying to buy things as cheaply as possible, but to be ethical consumers - for example buying energy-saving refrigerators and freezers and other household goods, or "fair trade" products like coffee imported at fair prices from people in poor countries. In saving and investing their money, too, they are not trying just to make more money, but to be ethical investors – for example investing in companies that treat their workers well, or help to conserve the environment, or provide goods and services that contribute to the health and well-being of their customers. In earning their money, also, they are not just wanting a well paid job, but the satisfaction of doing good work which is useful to other people, as well as bringing in enough income to meet their own and their family"s needs.

Increasing numbers of businesses are also becoming seriously involved in "business ethics" and "corporate social and environmental responsibility" - not just aiming to make profits, but also to make a valuable contribution to the wellbeing of people and the natural environment. Unfortunately, as a top-level European Union conference reported in December 2005, this does not apply to the big banks and other financial companies whose business is dealing with money.

Their critics say they continue to take no responsibility for the effects of their lending and investing, and that their determination to make high profits worsens world problems like climate change and poverty.

This growing concern about using money ethically raises an important question: why are money values so often in conflict with ethical values? A religious answer might be: because people are selfish and sinful. But the history of money offers a more practical explanation and a pointer to a better future.

UNDERSTANDING HOW THE MONEY SYSTEM WORKS.

The system of money today is biased against ethical values because it was developed to serve the interests of people who wanted greater power and wealth for themselves. Understanding this and looking at how it leads in practice to undesirable outcomes today, shows that that is largely due to the way in which national governments carry out their key responsibilities for money. Those are: to ensure that a reliable money supply is in circulation for everyone to use; to collect money as public revenue through a variety of taxes and charges; and to manage public spending to meet a variety of public needs.

Taxing things makes them more expensive; that discourages people from using them and producing them; cigarettes are an example. On the other hand, spending public money on things makes them cheaper or even free; that encourages people to use them and increases the number of people employed to provide them; public education and health services are examples. In democratic countries like France and Britain today taxation and public spending by national governments account for around 40% or 50% of the total value of everything produced - which economists call Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The way new money is created also influences who gets to spend it on what and who profits from it.

So the way a government carries out these three functions affects the prices of everything in the economy - even things that, although untaxed or unsubsidised themselves, benefit or suffer in competition with others that are taxed or subsidised.

The conflict between money values and ethical values arises because modern democratic governments have not yet systematically reformed the existing way of creating new money and the existing patterns of taxation and public spending, in order to encourage the majority of people to serve their own interests in ways that also serve the interests of other people and the natural world.

But awareness of the need for that is beginning to spread. The idea that central banks should provide the money supply as a public service and no longer allow commercial banks to create it as a source of profit for themselves is gaining support. So is the idea of a "tax shift". This would tax people and businesses less on the incomes and profits they get as rewards for useful work and enterprise, and more on what they take from the value of common resources - for example by profiting from rising land values or using the environment as a dump for waste and pollution. On public spending, there is growing support for paying everyone a basic income as their share of the value of common resources, instead of paying businesses big money to provide public services and paying "perverse" subsidies to encourage businesses and people to use more fossil fuels instead of less on things like transport and farming. The need is also increasingly recognised for properly organised global taxation, global public spending and a genuinely global currency, to counteract the domination of the world economy by transnational business and money.

The next chapter in the history of money may record local, national and international changes like these. Looking back from the end of the present century, they would be seen to have encouraged new patterns of production, transport, trade, work and family life - more efficient, fairer for the people of the world and their well-being, more sparing of the earth, and more fairly sharing the value of earth"s resources.

CONCLUSION

The origins of money are veiled in myths. Today, for most people, how money works is still shrouded in mystery. Most young people will want to understand it well enough to know how best to manage money for themselves and their families. Also, as citizens of their localities and countries and the world, many will want to understand how money could serve people"s interests better than it does today.

The history of money encourages a critical frame of mind. Kings and governments; bankers, traders and merchants; and professionals working for them - all have aimed to develop money to serve their own interests, not the interests of their fellow citizens.

Silver mining and gold mining have meant cruel deaths to millions of people. The introduction of paper money and electronic money and direct payment of money between different bank accounts have all in turn been used by banks to conceal that they create new money out of nothing as profit-making loans. That way they have turned what should be public revenue into private profit, and burdened people and businesses and governments with constantly growing debts. Rich countries have developed the international money system to serve their interests at the expense of poor countries.

The thing to keep in mind is that that is why the system of money now works as it does. The way it works will have to be changed for it to become a scoring system for a fairer game of economic life which serves the interests of most people. To make that happen is an important challenge. After all, the system of money is the scoring system for a game everyone has to play. The history of money is a work in progress.

SOURCES

1. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Third Edition. – Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex CM20 2 JE, England and Associated Companies throughout the World. – ©Longman Group Ltd, 2000. – 1873 c.
2. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Second Edition. – Macmillan Education, Between Tows Road, Oxford OX4 3PP, A Division of Macmillan Publishers Limited, Companies and Representatives throughout the World. Text © A&C Black Publishers Ltd, 2007. – 1748 c.
3. Michael Graff. The Quantity Theory of Money in Historical Perspective. – Brisbane and Zurich, April 2008. – 32 c.
4. Money: A Historical Look. Extract from Money and Monetary Policy in Canada. Toronto: Canadian Foundation for Economic Education, 1994. – 12 c.

Деньги… Не в них счастье, но и без них не обойтись. Финансы помогают стать независимым и самостоятельным. Как вы уже догадались, наша тема посвящена деньгам и всему, что их касается на английском языке. Финансы — тема щекотливая, потому что их всегда мало, их не хватает. Но мы надеемся, что фразы, представленные ниже и рассмотренные в контексте примеров и перевода, вам пригодятся.

Иногда перевод слов, связанных с деньгами, бывает неожиданным. Потому что, как вы знаете, слова в английском языке имеют несколько значений.

Новичкам и даже тем, кто не изучает английский язык, известно это слово. «Money» — это деньги, финансы, в общем их значении. И английский язык нам напоминает, что это неисчисляемое существительное.

Например:

• What about money today? I have some money for lunch and coffee. — Что насчет денег сегодня? У меня немного денег на обед и кофе.
• Did you get your money? — Ты получил свои деньги? There is little money left. — Осталось мало денег.
• It is impossible to do little work and to get much money.- Невозможно мало работать и получать много денег.

Как вы заметили, «Money» — это общее слово для обозначения денег на английском.

Что касается финансов на английском

В этом разделе рассмотрим термины, касающиеся финансов и денег на английском и их перевод на русский язык. Вот основные денежные термины и их перевод на русский:

• ATM (= automated teller machine) / cash dispenser (BrE) — банкомат

I want to take my money from the ATM. Our ATM is broken; I can’t take my money. — Я хочу снять свои деньги с банкомата. Наш банкомат сломан; я не могу взять свои деньги.

• banknote / bill (AmE) — банкнота

Do you have any money?-Yes, I have some banknotes of 100 dollars. — У тебя есть деньги? Да, у меня несколько банкнот по 100 долларов.

• borrow — занимать

Can you borrow me some money till Monday? — Ты мог бы занять мне немного денег до понедельника?

• be broke — быть банкротом

Can you give me some money?-No, I am broke this week. — Ты можешь дать мне немного денег? Нет, я банкрот на этой неделе.

• budget — бюджет

Unfortunately, my budget is poor this month. — К сожалению, мой бюджет беден в этом месяце.

• cash — наличные (деньги)

Can you pay by cash?-Yes, sure. — Вы можете оплатить наличными? Да, конечно

• cashier — кассир

The cashier in this bank is very precise. — кассир в этом банке очень точен.

• cheque (BrE) / check (AmE) — чек

At the moment I don’t have any cash, but I have a cheque of 1000 dollars. — В данный момент у меня нет наличных, но есть чек на 1000 долларов.

• coin — монета

Tom has some golden coins of the XIXth century. — У Тома есть несколько золотых монет XIX века.

• currency — валюта

We need some currency to go to the USA. — Нам понадобится валюта для поездки в США.

• debt — долг

How is Tom? Oh, he has a lot of debts. — как поживает Том? О, у него много долгов.

• deposit — депозит

You can have some deposits in our bank. — Вы можете открыть несколько депозитов в нашем банке.

Полезные английские слова про деньги

Каждому из нас иногда приходилось давать в займы, одалживать, дарить, вкладывать или жертвовать денежные средства. Конечно, при общении с англоговорящими вам также придется затронуть данную тему, и без полезных английских слов про деньги вам не обойтись:

• donate — дарить, пожертвовать, давать на благотворительность

Alex donated a lot of money to the children’s house; it’s wonderful. — Алекс пожертвовал много денег детскому дому; это чудесно.

• exchange rate — обменный курс

The exchange rate of the currency today is very high. — Обменный курс валют сегодня очень высок.

• fee — гонорар, вознаграждение

This is you fee for the concert. — Это ваш гонорар за концерт.

• interest — проценты, процентная ставка

What’s your interest in this bank? — Какова ваша процентная ставка в этом банке?

• invest — инвестировать, вкладывать

Mr Green wants to invest a lot of money in our bank. — Господин Грин хочет вложить много денег в наш банк.

• legal tender — законное платежное средство

I have a legal tender in my business. — У меня законное платежное средство в моем бизнесе.

• lend — давать взаймы, одалживать

I can lend you some money, if you want. — Я могу одолжить тебе немного денег, если хочешь.

• loan — заем

You want a very big loan, I can’t agree with it.- Вы хотите очень большой заем, я не могу с этим согласиться.

• owe — быть должным

Why Tom is angry with you?-I owe him some money. — Почему Том сердит на тебя? Я должен ему денег.

• receipt — чек, квитанция

Here is your receipt. — Вот ваш чек.

• refund — возвращать (деньги, ущерб, и т. п.)

I damaged your car; I want to refund the money.- Я повредил вашу машину; я хочу вернуть деньги за ущерб.

• tip, tips — чаевые

Oh, why do you give so many tips to the waiter? — О, почему ты даешь так много чаевых официанту?

• withdraw — снимать средства со счета

Can you help me with some money?-Sure, I have to withdraw some from the bank. — Ты можешь помочь мне с деньгами? Конечно, я должен снять немного из банка.

Как вы поняли, друзья, финансы — неотъемлемая часть бизнеса. А английский язык — весьма неординарная штука, в этом мы убеждались не раз. Таковы были основные значения терминов, связанных с денежными средствами и их перевод на русский.

MONEY IS USED FOR BUYING OR SELLING GOODS, FOR MEASURING VALUE AND FOR STORING WEALTH. Almost every society now has a money economy based on coins and paper notes of one kind or another. However, this has not always been true. In primitive societies a system of barter was used. Barter was a system of direct exchange of goods. Somebody could exchange a sheep, for example, for anything in the market place that they considered to be equal value. Barter however was a very unsatisfactory system because people’s precise needs seldom coincided. People needed a more practical system of exchange, and various money systems developed based on goods, which the members of a society recognized as having a value. Cattle, grain, teeth, shells, features, skulls, salt, elephant tusks and tobacco have all been used. Precious metals gradually took over because, when made into coins, they were portable, durable, recognizable, and divisible into larger and smaller units of value.

A coin is a piece of metal, usually disc-shaped, which bears lettering, designs or numbers showing its value. Until the 18 th and 19 th centuries coins were given monetary worth based on the exact amount of metal contained in them, but most modern coins are based on face value, the value the governments choose to give them, irrespective of the actual metal content. Coins have been made of gold (Au), silver (Ag), copper (Cu), aluminum (Al), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), plastic and in China even from pressed tealeaves. Most governments now issue paper money in the form of notes, which are “promises to pay". Paper money is obviously easier to handle and much more convenient in the modern world. Checks, bankers, cards and credit cards are being used increasingly and it is possibly to imagine a world where “money” in the form of coins and paper currently will no longer be used. Even today, in the U.S many places-especially filling stations-will not accept cash at night for security reasons.

Barter and the Double Coincidence of Wants

As long as specialization was limited, desirable trades were relatively easy to uncover. As the economy developed, however, greater specialization in the division of labor increased the difficulty of finding goods that each trader wanted to exchange. Rather than just two possible types of producers, there were, say, a hundred types of producers, ranging from potters to shoemakers. The potter in need of new shoes might have trouble finding a shoemaker in need of pots. Barter depends on a double coincidence of wants, which occurs only when traders are willing to exchange their product for what the other is selling. The cobbler must be willing to exchange shoes for the pots offered by the potter, and the potter must be willing to exchange pots for the shoes offered by the cobbler. Not only might this double coincidence of wants be hard to find but after the two traders connect they would also need to agree upon a rate of exchange-that is, how many pots should be exchanged for a pair of shoes? Increased specialization made the barter system of exchange more time-consuming and cumbersome.

When only two goods are produced, only one exchange rate must be determined, but as the number of goods produced in the economy increases, the number of exchange rates grows sharply. Negotiating the exchange rates among commodities is complicated in a barter economy because there is no common measure of value. Sometimes the differences in the value of the products made barter difficult. For example, suppose the cobbler wanted to buy a home. If a home exchanged for 2000 pairs of shoes, the cobbler would be hard-pressed to find a home seller in need of that many shoes. These difficulties with barter have led even very simple and primitive economies to use money, as we will see next.

Earliest Money and Its Functions

We have already discussed the movement from self-sufficiency to more specialized production requiring barter. We saw that the greater the degree of specialization in the economy, the more difficult it became to discover a double coincidence of wants and then to negotiate mutually beneficial exchanges. We should note that nobody actually recorded the emergence of money. Thus, we can only speculate about how money first came into use.

Through repeated exchanges, traders may have found that there were certain goods for which there was always a ready market. If a trader could not find a desired match or did not need goods for immediate consumption, some good with a ready market could be accepted instead. So traders began to accept certain goods not for immediate consumption but because these goods would be acceptable to others and therefore could be retraded later. For example, corn might become accepted because traders knew corn was always in demand. As one good became generally acceptable in return for all other goods, that good began to function as money. As we will see, anything that is used as money serves three important functions: a medium of exchange, a standard of value, and a store of wealth.

Medium of Exchange If a community, by luck or by design, can find one commodity that everyone accepts in exchange for whatever is sold, traders can save much time, disappointment, and sheer aggravation. Separating the sale of one good from the purchase of another requires something acceptable to all parties involved in the transaction. Suppose corn plays this role, a role that clearly goes beyond its usual function as food. We call corn a medium of exchange because corn is accepted in exchange by all buyers and sellers, whether or not they want corn for its own uses. A medium of exchange is anything that is generally accepted in return for goods and services sold. Corn is no longer an end but a means to an end. The end may be shoes, meat, pots, whatever. The person who accepts corn in exchange for some product may already have more corn than the entire family could eat in a year, but the corn is not accepted with a view toward consumption. It is accepted because it can be readily exchanged for other goods. Corn can be used to purchase whatever is desired whenever it is desired. Because in this example corn both is a commodity and serves as money, we call corn a commodity money. The earliest money was commodity money.

Standard of Value As one commodity, such as corn, became widely accepted, the prices of all goods came to be quoted in terms of corn. The chosen commodity became a common standard of value. The price of shoes or pots could be expressed in bushels of corn. Thus, not only does corn serve as a medium of exchange but it also becomes a yardstick for measuring the value of all goods and services. Rather than having to quote the rate of exchange for each good in terms of every other good, as was the case in the barter economy, the price of everything could be measured in terms of corn. For example, if a pair of shoes sells for two bushels of corn and a five-gallon pot sells for one bushel of corn, then one pair of shoes exchanges for two five-gallon pots.

Store of Wealth Because people often do not want to make purchases at the same time they sell an item, the purchasing power acquired through sales must somehow be preserved. Money serves as a store of wealth by retaining purchasing power over time. The cobbler exchanges shoes for corn in the belief that other suppliers will accept corn in exchange for whatever the cobbler demands later. Corn represents a way of deferring purchasing power yet conserving that power until consumption is desired. The better money is at preserving purchasing power, the better it serves as a store of wealth.

When we think of someone selling one good in order to be able to buy a second good, then the exchange of the first good for corn is only half of the exchange. Goods are first exchanged for the commodity money, corn; corn is -later exchanged for other goods. Breaking the exchange in two is much more convenient than trying to work out a barter arrangement, with its frequent delays and disappointments. With money, the buyers and sellers need to have only one good in common instead of two.

Any commodity that acquires a high degree of acceptability throughout the economy thereby becomes money. Consider some commodities used as money over the centuries. Cattle served as money, first for the Greeks and then for the Romans. In fact, the word pecuniary comes from the Latin word pecus, meaning "cattle." Other commodity moneys used at various times include tobacco and wampum (polished strings of shells) in colonial Amer­ica, tea pressed into small cakes in Russia, and dates in North Africa.

Whatever serves as a medium of exchange is called money, no matter what it is, no matter how it first came to serve as a medium of exchange, and no matter why it continues to serve this function. So long as there is something that sellers willingly accept in exchange for whatever they sell-rather than looking around for goods they in particular would like to consume-that article is money, whether it is animal, vegetable, or mineral. The only test for money is that it be widely accepted in return for goods and services. Some kinds of money perform this function well, others not so well. But good or bad, it is all money.

Problems with Commodity Money

Corn does as well as some other commodities that have served as money throughout history. But there are problems with most commodity moneys, including corn. First, corn must be properly stored or its quality will deteriorate; even then, it will not maintain its quality for long. Second, corn is bulky, so exchange becomes unwieldy for major purchases. For example, suppose a new home cost 50,000 bushels of corn. Many truckloads of corn would be involved in such a transaction. Third, if all corn is valued equally in exchange, people will tend to keep the best corn and trade away the lowest-quality corn. The quality of corn in circulation will therefore decline, reducing the acceptability of this commodity money. Sir Thomas Gresham, founder of the Royal Exchange of London, pointed out back in the sixteenth century that "bad money drives out good money," and this has come to be known as Gresham"s Law". When moneys of different quality circulate side .by side, people tend to trade away the inferior money and hoard the best.

A final problem with corn as with other commodity moneys is that the value of corn depends on its supply and demand, which may vary unpredictably. On the supply side, if a bumper crop increases the supply of corn, corn would likely become less valuable, so more corn would exchange for all other goods. On the demand side, any change in the demand for corn as food would alter the amount available as a medium of exchange, and this, too, would influence the value of corn. Erratic fluctuations in the value of corn limit its usefulness as money, particularly as a store of wealth. If people cannot rely on the value of corn over time, they will be reluctant to hold it as a store of wealth. More generally, since the value of money depends on its supply being limited, anything that can be easily produced by anyone would not serve well as commodity money. For example, dirt would not serve well as commodity money.

Metallic Money and Coinage

Throughout history several metals were used as commodity moneys, includ­ing iron and copper. More important, however, were the precious metals- silver and gold-which have always been held in high regard. The division of commodity money into units was often quite natural, as in a bushel of corn or a head of cattle. When rock salt was used as money, it was cut into uniform bricks. Since salt \vas usually of consistent quality, a trader needed only to count the bricks to determine the amount of money. With precious metals, however, both the quantity and quality became open to question. Because precious metals could be debased with cheaper alloys, the quantity and quality of the metal had to be ascertained with each exchange.

This quality-control problem was addressed by coinage. Coinage, when fully developed, determined both the amount of metal and the quality of the metal. The use of coins allowed payment by count rather than by weight. Initially, coins were stamped only on one side, but undetectable amounts of the metal could be "shaved" from the smooth side of the coin. To prevent shaving, coins were stamped on both sides. But another problem arose. Because the borders of coins remained blank, small amounts of the metal could be "clipped" from the edges. To prevent this, coins were bordered with a well-defined rim and were milled around the edges. If you have a dime or quarter, notice the tiny serrations on the edge plus the words along the border. These features, throwbacks from the time when these coins were silver rather than a cheap alloy, prevented the recipient from "getting clipped."

The power to coin money was viewed as an act of sovereignty, and counterfeiting, an act of treason. In England the king extended his sover­eignty only to silver and gold coins. When the face value of the coin exceeds the cost of coinage, the minting of coins becomes a source of revenue to the sovereign. Seigniorage refers to the amount of precious metal extracted by the sovereign, or the seignior, during coinage. Debasement of the currency represented a source of profit for profligate governments. Token money is the name given to coins whose face value exceeds their metallic value.

Money and Banking

Early banks were little more than moneychangers, exchanging coins and bullion (uncoined gold or silver bars) from one form to another for a fee. Money was counted on a banque, the French word for "bench." Banking, as the term is understood today, dates back to London goldsmiths of the seventeenth century. Because goldsmiths had a safe in which to store gold, others in the community came to rely on goldsmiths to hold their money and other valuables for safekeeping. The goldsmith found that when money was held for many customers, deposits and withdrawals tended to balance out, so a pool of deposits remained in the safe at a fairly constant level. Loans could be made from this pool of idle cash, and the goldsmith could thus earn interest.

The system of keeping one"s money on deposit with the goldsmith was safer than leaving money where it could be easily stolen, but it was a bit of a nuisance to have to visit the goldsmith each time money was needed. For example, the farmer would visit the goldsmith to withdraw enough money to buy a horse. The farmer then paid the horse trader, which promptly deposited the receipts with the goldsmith. Thus, money took a round trip from goldsmith to farmer to horse trader and back to goldsmith. Because depositors grew tired of going to the goldsmith every time they needed to make a purchase, the practice developed whereby a purchaser, such as the farmer, wrote the goldsmith instructions to pay the horse trader so much from the farmer"s account. The payment amounted to having the goldsmith move gold from one stack (the farmer"s) to another (the horse trader"s). These written instructions to the goldsmith were the first checks.

By combining the idea of cash loans w4th checking, the goldsmith soon discovered how to make loans by check. The check was a claim against the goldsmith, but the borrower"s promise to repay the loan became the gold­smith"s asset. The goldsmith could extend a loan by creating an account against which the borrower could write checks. Goldsmiths, or banks, in this way were able to "create moneys-that is, create claims against themselves that were -generally accepted as a means of payment-as a medium of exchange. This money, though based only on an entry in the goldsmith"s ledger, was accepted because of the public"s confidence that these claims would be honored. The total claims against the bank consisted of customer deposits plus deposits created through loans. Because these claims against the bank exceeded the bank"s gold and other reserves, this was the first fractional reserve banking system, a system in which only a portion, or fraction, of deposits were backed up by reserves. The reserve ratio measures reserves as a proportion of total deposits. For example, if the goldsmith had reserves of $5000 but total deposits of $10,000, the reserve ratio would be 50 percent.

Another way a bank could create claims against itself was to issue bank notes. In London, goldsmith bankers introduced bank notes about the same as they introduced checks. Bank notes were pieces of paper that promised to pay the bearer a specific amount in gold when presented to the issuing bank for redemption. Whereas only the individual to whom the deposit was directed could redeem checks, notes could be redeemed by anyone who held them. Notes redeemable for gold or another valuable commodity are called fiduciary money. Fiduciary money was often "as good as gold" since the bearer could, upon request, redeem the note for gold. In some ways fiduciary money was better than gold because it took up less space and was easier to carry.

The amount of fiduciary money issued depended on the bank"s estimate of the proportion of notes that would be redeemed for gold. The greater the redemption rate, the fewer notes could be issued based on a given amount of gold reserves. Initially, these promises to pay in gold were issued by private individuals or banks, but over time governments developed a larger role in their printing and circulation. The tendency to redeem notes for gold depended on the note holder"s confidence in the bank"s willingness to do so upon request.

Once fiduciary money became widely accepted, it was perhaps inevitable that governments would begin issuing fiat money, which consists of notes that derive their status as money by power of the state, of fiat. Fiat money is money because the government says it is money. Fiat money is not redeemable for anything other than more fiat money; it is not backed by a promise to pay something of intrinsic value. You can think of fiat money as mere paper money. It is acceptable not because it is intrinsically useful or valuable but because the government requires that it be accepted as payment. Fiat money is declared legal tender by the government, meaning that creditors must accept it as payment for debts. Gradually, people came to accept fiat money because of the belief that others would accept it as well. The money issued in the United States today and, indeed, paper money throughout most of the world is now largely fiat money.

The Value of Money

Why does money have value? As we have seen, various commodities served as the earliest moneys. Commodities such as corn or tobacco had value in use even if for some reason they became less acceptable in exchange. The commodity feature of the money bolstered confidence in its acceptability. When paper money came into use, acceptability was initially fostered by the promise to redeem it for gold or silver. But since most paper money throughout the world is now fiat money, there is no promise of redemption.

So why can a piece of paper bearing the image of Alexander Hamilton and a 10 in each corner be exchanged for a large pepperoni pizza or anything else selling for $10. People accept these pieces of paper because they believe others will do so. Fiat money has no value other than its ability to be exchanged for goods and services now and in the future. Its value lies in people"s belief in its value.

The value of money is reflected by its purchasing power-the rate at which money is exchanged for goods and services. The higher the price level is, the fewer goods and services can be purchased with each dollar, so the less each dollar is worth. The purchasing power of each dollar can be compared over time by accounting for changes in the price level. To measure the purchasing power of the dollar in a particular year, first compute the price index for that year, then divide 100 by that price index. For example, the consumer price index for 1986 was 328, using 1967 as the base year. The value of a 1986 dollar is therefore 100/328, or about SO.30 measured in 1967 dollars. Thus, a 1986 dollar buys less than one-third the goods and services purchased by a dollar in 1967.

Too Much and Too Little Money

Money serves as a medium of exchange, a standard of value, and a store of wealth. One way to understand these functions of money is to look at situations in which money did not perform these functions well. Money may not function well as a medium of exchange because there is too little money, too much money, or because the price system is not allowed to operate. With prices growing by the hour, money no longer represented a stable store of wealth, so people were unwilling to hold money. With rapidly rising prices, relative prices also became distorted, so buyers and sellers had difficulty knowing the appropriate price of each good. Thus, money became less useful as a standard of value-that is, as a way of comparing the price of one good relative to another. Money still served as a medium of exchange, but as larger and larger amounts of money were needed to carry out the simplest purchases, money became more cumbersome. Exchange demanded more time and energy. In short, when there is too much money, the economy becomes less productive than when there is an appropriate amount of money.

On the other hand, if there is too little money in the economy or if the price system is not allowed to function, the economy may be reduced to barter, and, as we have seen, barter is inefficient. For example, just after World War II money in Germany became -largely useless because, despite tremendous inflationary pressure in the economy, occupation forces imposed strict price controls. Since prices were set well below what people thought they should be, sellers stopped accepting money, forcing people to use barter. Experts estimate that because of the lack of a viable medium of exchange, the German economy produced only half the output that it would have produced with a smoothly functioning monetary system. The German "economic miracle" that occurred after 1948 can be credited in large part to that country"s adoption of a reliable monetary system. It has been said that no machine increases the economy"s productivity like properly functioning money. Indeed, it seems hard to overstate the value of a reliable monetary system. Consider in the following case study a more contemporary example of the official currency failing to serve well as a medium of exchange.

Conclusion

Just as the division of labor creates the need for exchange, exchange creates the need for money. With money, exchange need not rely on the double coincidence of wants required with barter. People can sell their labor in return for money to be used for future consumption.

1. Barter was the first form of exchange. As the degree of specialization grew, it became more difficult to uncover the double coincidence of wants required with barter. The time and inconvenience involved with barter led even simple economies to introduce money.

2. Money serves three primary functions: a medium of exchange, a standard of value, and a store of wealth. The first money was commodity money, where a good such as corn served also as money. With fiduciary money, the second type of money introduced what changed hands was a piece of paper that could be redeemed for something of value, such as silver or gold. The third type of money introduced was fiat money, which is paper money that can not be redeemed for anything other than more paper money. Fiat money is given its value as money by law. Most currencies throughout world today are fiat money.

Деньги – неотъемлемая часть нашей жизни. Мы их зарабатываем, тратим, копим и т. д. И потому в любом языке существует масса слов, связанных с деньгами: устойчивые выражения (set expressions ), поговорки (proverbs ), идиомы (idioms ). Даже само слово «деньги» весьма абстрактно. Под деньгами могут подразумеваться купюры/банкноты (bank notes ), монеты (coins ), мелочь (change / small change ). А уж сколько существует словосочетаний (collocations ) по теме! Конечно, их огромное количество, но в данной статье мы постараемся осветить наиболее популярные из них.

Прилагательное + money

• Easy money – легко доставшиеся деньги.
  

  Easy money won’t teach you how to be thrifty. – Легко доставшиеся деньги не научат тебя бережливости.

• Bonus money – премиальные.
  

  I’m going to spend my bonus money on a trip – Я собираюсь потратить премию на поездку.

• Hard-earned money – с трудом заработанные деньги.
  

  Hard-earned money is the most appreciated. – С трудом заработанные деньги больше всего ценятся.

• Public/taxpayers’/government money – деньги налогоплательщиков.
  

  The public should know how the government money is spent. – Общественность должна знать, как тратятся деньги налогоплательщиков.

• Pocket /spending /pin money – карманные деньги.
  

  I always have some pin money on me. – У меня всегда при себе есть карманные деньги.

• Dirty money – грязные деньги.
  

  Stay away from his dirty money. – Держись подальше от его грязных денег.

• Bribe money – взятка.
  

  The official took the bribe money and ended up in jail. – Чиновник взял взятку и оказался в тюрьме.

• Ransom money – выкуп.
  

  They were supposed to leave the ransom money under the bridge. – Они должны были оставить выкуп под мостом.

• Hush /protection money – взятка за молчание.
  

  The swindler was extorting hush money. – Мошенник вымогал деньги за молчание.

• Counterfeit /fake money – фальшивые деньги.
  

  Beware of counterfeit money. – Берегитесь фальшивых денег.

• Earnest money – честно заработанные деньги.
  

  Earnest money will ensure you clear conscience. – Честные деньги обеспечат вам чистую совесть.

• Silly money – бешеные деньги.
  

  They say silly money spoils people. – Говорят, бешеные деньги портят людей.

• Tight money – недостаточное количество денег.
  

  My tight money doesn’t let me make the most of life. – Недостаток денег не позволяет мне наслаждаться жизнью в полной мере.

• Well-spent money – с умом потраченные деньги.
  

  Well-spent money shows that you are a good money manager. – С умом потраченные деньги показывают, что вы умеете с ними обращаться.

Глагол + money

Некоторые разговорные выражения на тему «Деньги» на английском языке можно почерпнуть из данного видео:

Дополнительная лексика из видео

• Readies – наличные (разговорный вариант слова cash ).
• Loose /spare change – мелочь.
• E-cash – электронные деньги.
• ATM (automatic teller machine ) или cash machine – банкомат (разговорный вариант – a hole in the wall ).
• Counterfeit /fake money – фальшивые деньги.
• Petty cash – мелкая наличность.
• Singles – купюры номиналом в 1 доллар (фунт).
• Fiver – пятёрка (пять фунтов стерлингов или пять долларов).
• Tenner – десятка.
• Grand – тысяча (фунтов или долларов).
• Buck – бакс.

Идиомы о деньгах на английском языке

О деньгах можно говорить бесконечно. Не удивительно, что эта тема дала жизнь стольким многим идиомам английского.

1. To put your money where your mouth is – отвечать за свои слова.
   

   You always say it but you never do. Put your money where your mouth is! – Ты всегда говоришь, но никогда не делаешь. Отвечай за свои слова!

2. To have money to burn – иметь кучу денег (куры не клюют).
   

   She’s a big shot and has money to burn. – Она большая шишка, и у нее денег куры не клюют.

3. To save money for a rainy day – копить деньги на черный день.
   

   I never could save money for a rainy day – Я никогда не мог копить деньги на черный день.

4. To be flush with money – загребать деньги лопатой.
   

   He is flush with money as his business is very successful. – Он загребает деньги лопатой, поскольку его бизнес очень успешен.

5. Money loves to be counted – деньги любят счет.
   

   Don’t be hasty – money loves to be counted. – Не будь поспешен – деньги любят счет.

6. To be short of funds /money /cash – быть не при деньгах, на мели.
   

   Now I’m short of money and can’t join you. – Сейчас я на мели и не могу к тебе присоединиться.

7. For love nor money – ни за какие деньги.
   

   I will not do it for love nor money. – Я не сделаю это ни за какие деньги.

8. At all costs – за любые деньги, любой ценой.
   

   I am ready to buy this dress at all costs. – Я готова купить это платье за любые деньги.

9. To break the bank – сорвать банк.
   

   He is a gambler and always hopes to break the bank. – Он азартный игрок и всегда надеется сорвать банк.

10. To feel like a million dollars – чувствовать себя на все 100.
    

    After the holiday I feel like a million dollars. – После отпуска я чувствую себя на все 100.

11. To live beyond /within one’s means – жить не по средствам/по средствам.
    

    His poor childhood taught him to live within his means. – Его бедное детство научило его жить по средствам.

12. Piggy bank – копилка в виде свинки.
    

    When my piggy bank is full, I’ll break it and see how much money is in. – Когда моя свинка-копилка будет полной, я разобью ее и увижу, сколько денег внутри.

• Английский сленг богат словами о деньгах – «капуста», «баксы» и другие интересные словечки вы найдете в статье « ».

Вся лексика, приведенная в статье, доступна для скачивания по ссылке:

И в завершение предлагаем вам небольшой лексический тест на тему «Деньги» на английском языке:

​

Тест

Деньги в английском языке